What Are the Intrinsic and Extrinsic Rewards of Doing Research?

What Do Researchers Actually Get From Doing Research?

Research can demand months or years of work. It may involve failed experiments, difficult recruitment, rejected manuscripts, revisions that somehow generate more revisions, and long periods in which the eventual payoff remains uncertain. Why, then, do people continue doing it?

Part of the answer lies in the rewards associated with research. Some arise from engaging in inquiry itself: discovering something, developing mastery, solving a difficult problem, or experiencing the satisfaction of understanding something more clearly. Other rewards are separable outcomes that research may help produce, such as a degree, publication, promotion, recognition, funding, employment, or professional opportunities.

Calling these intrinsic and extrinsic rewards is useful, but the distinction needs care. A reward is not necessarily the same thing as a motivation, and an external reward is not automatically undesirable.

Research Can Be Rewarding Both in Itself and Through What It Leads To

Research Produces More Than One Kind of Reward

Intrinsic Rewards Are Experienced Through the Research Activity

Intrinsic rewards arise because an activity is interesting, satisfying, or engaging in its own right. In self-determination theory, intrinsic motivation refers to activities undertaken for their inherent interest and enjoyment rather than for a separable consequence.

In research, the corresponding experiences can include the pleasure of discovering an unexpected pattern, finally understanding a difficult phenomenon, developing competence with a method, constructing a convincing explanation, or solving a problem that has resisted previous attempts.

These rewards do not need to appear on a curriculum vitae to matter. A researcher can experience them even when a project has not yet produced a publication, citation, award, or other externally visible outcome.

Curiosity and Discovery Can Be Powerful Rewards

Research begins with uncertainty. For someone genuinely interested in a question, reducing that uncertainty can itself be satisfying. The moment when an analysis clarifies a confusing pattern or evidence challenges an assumption can be rewarding precisely because the researcher wanted to know the answer.

This does not mean every research finding is exciting. Much of research involves routine, difficult, or frustrating work. A researcher may find the central intellectual problem fascinating while finding data cleaning considerably less enchanting. Intrinsic reward can therefore vary across tasks within the same project.

Mastery Can Be Rewarding Even Before a Study Produces Results

Researchers also develop competence through research. Learning to formulate better questions, conduct interviews, design experiments, analyze data, write code, use unfamiliar methods, interpret evidence, or communicate findings can produce a sense of mastery.

This matters because some of the benefits of doing research accrue to the researcher before the final output exists. A doctoral student who learns to conduct an independent study has gained something substantial even before the dissertation is deposited or its findings are published.

Extrinsic Rewards Exist Outside the Research Activity Itself

Extrinsic rewards are outcomes separable from performing the activity. Research may contribute to obtaining a degree, fulfilling an employment requirement, publishing an article, receiving recognition, securing funding, gaining promotion, obtaining tenure where that system applies, strengthening an application, or opening opportunities for collaboration and employment.

These outcomes matter because research does not occur in an institutional vacuum. Universities, research organizations, funders, and professional communities create systems in which some research achievements are formally or informally rewarded.

The Same Outcome Can Have More Than One Meaning

Classification becomes more complicated when we consider what a reward means to the researcher. Take publication. Publication is an external outcome because it is separable from conducting the research itself. Yet a researcher may value publication because it allows other scholars to scrutinize and use the findings, because it contributes to promotion, because completing the manuscript feels personally satisfying, or for all of these reasons.

Likewise, funding may be valued as a prestigious achievement, but it may also matter because it enables the researcher to investigate a question they deeply care about. The visible reward does not reveal the researcher's complete motivational structure.

Rewards and Motivation Are Not the Same Thing

A useful conceptual distinction is between what a researcher receives and why the researcher acts. A reward is an outcome or experience associated with research. Motivation concerns the processes and reasons that energize and direct behavior.

This distinction helps explain why receiving an extrinsic reward does not necessarily mean someone was primarily extrinsically motivated. A researcher might investigate a problem entirely because it fascinates them and later receive an award for the work. The award is extrinsic, but it need not have been the original reason for undertaking the study.

Conversely, someone may pursue research specifically to obtain a publication required for promotion. In that case, the anticipated extrinsic reward is functioning as an important extrinsic motivator. The broader difference between intrinsic and extrinsic research motivation therefore concerns the reason for acting, not merely the rewards that eventually appear.

Extrinsic Rewards Can Be Pursued Autonomously or Under Pressure

Self-determination theory further complicates the familiar intrinsic-versus-extrinsic dichotomy. Extrinsic motivation varies in autonomy. People can pursue an instrumental outcome because they feel controlled by rewards or sanctions, or because they personally endorse the value of the activity.

Consider two doctoral students completing research because a dissertation is required for the degree. One may experience the project almost entirely as an imposed obstacle. The other may personally value becoming an independent researcher and willingly accept the dissertation as part of that development. Both are working toward a separable outcome, but their experience of motivation differs substantially.

For this reason, the presence of an extrinsic reward tells us less than we might initially think. What matters is also whether researchers experience their work as self-directed and meaningful or predominantly controlled by contingencies and pressure. Self-determination theory distinguishes autonomous motivation from controlled motivation on precisely this basis.

External Rewards Can Support Research Without Becoming Its Purpose

Publications disseminate findings. Funding provides resources. Promotion can recognize professional development. Awards may draw attention to valuable work. None of these outcomes is inherently incompatible with serious scholarship.

The difficulty arises when reward systems become sufficiently dominant that researchers begin optimizing their behavior for the rewarded indicator. If publication count is heavily rewarded, for example, researchers may have incentives to prioritize producing more publishable units. If particular metrics dominate evaluation, attention may shift toward improving those indicators regardless of whether doing so improves the underlying research.

This is why publications, promotion, recognition, and funding as research motivations deserve analysis beyond simply declaring them legitimate or illegitimate.

Rewards Can Sometimes Pull in Different Directions

A researcher may enjoy pursuing a difficult question that requires several years of work while working within a system that rewards frequent publication. Another may care about a locally important problem whose likely scholarly visibility is modest. A third may want to share negative findings even though positive results appear easier to publish.

In such situations, the reward structure can create tension between what the researcher finds scientifically or personally worthwhile and what appears advantageous professionally. This does not mean conflict is inevitable, but it explains why the interaction between intrinsic and extrinsic research motivations can become consequential.

One Research Project Can Produce Many Different Rewards

The first experiences are closely associated with intrinsic reward. Publication, promotion credit, and the collaborative opportunity are extrinsic outcomes. Yet they belong to the same research experience and need not compete.

The more revealing question is what happens if the rewards begin pointing in different directions. If the researcher later abandons questions they consider important solely because those questions are less likely to generate rewarded outputs, the incentive system is no longer merely rewarding research. It is helping determine what research gets done.

Common Misunderstandings About Research Rewards

Know Which Rewards You Value and What They Are Doing to Your Decisions

There is little value in pretending that external rewards do not matter. If your employment system considers publications, if you need a degree, or if funding determines whether a project can continue, those realities legitimately affect your decisions.

A more useful approach is to examine whether the rewards complement the reasons you consider the research worth doing or are beginning to replace them.

This distinction becomes especially useful when considering why researchers do research versus why research systems reward them. Those two things can align, but there is no reason to assume that they always will.

Identify the Rewards Attached to Your Research

Questions About Intrinsic and Extrinsic Research Rewards

The Rewards of Research Extend Beyond What Appears on a CV

How to Cite This Guide

This guide is intended to be read, shared, and used in research, teaching, and academic work. If you draw on its ideas, explanations, or other content, please acknowledge the source by citing the guide. Doing so gives appropriate credit and helps your readers locate the original resource.