Search across guide titles, topics, keywords, and content throughout the Researcher's Field Guide.
Showing 651–675 of 894 results
A conceptual framework can be broader than the empirical study it informs, but that does not make every omission harmless. Learn when examining only part of a framework is defensible and when the framework promises more than the study investigates.
Read Guide →Not every research problem can be repaired by changing an instrument, sample, or statistical test. Learn when recurring methodological difficulties suggest that the question, framework, assumptions, or scope of the study needs reconsideration.
Read Guide →Your conceptual foundation does not need to answer every question before research design begins. It does need to be clear enough that you know what you are investigating, why it matters, and what evidence would be capable of answering the question.
Read Guide →A research design does not become appropriate simply because it is widely used in your discipline. Learn how to distinguish established methodological conventions from the evidence your question actually requires, and when departing from familiar approaches is justified.
Read Guide →A research protocol should contain enough information to explain why the study is being conducted and exactly how it will be carried out. Its contents should reflect the study design and applicable requirements rather than a universal template.
Read Guide →Primary and secondary data are not simply two ways of obtaining the same evidence. Whether you collect new data or work with existing data changes which parts of the study you can design yourself and which constraints you inherit.
Read Guide →Using an established measure can save substantial development work, but an existing instrument is not automatically suitable for every study. Learn when adaptation or new measure development may be justified and what each choice requires.
Read Guide →Communities can help identify, develop, refine, and prioritize research questions, particularly when lived or local knowledge is important to deciding what deserves investigation. Community priorities still need to be translated into feasible, ethical, and scientifically answerable research questions.
Read Guide →Participatory research changes who contributes to producing knowledge and how influence is distributed across the research process. It does not abandon research rigor or require every decision to be made collectively.
Read Guide →An ethics committee may request a change intended to protect participants that also creates a methodological problem. Learn how to identify the underlying ethical concern, explain the methodological consequence, and propose a defensible alternative.
Read Guide →A good response to ethics committee comments makes it easy to see what was requested, what you changed, where you changed it, and why. Learn how to prepare a clear point-by-point response and coordinated revision package.
Read Guide →Participants need enough relevant information to understand what participation involves and why they might or might not want to take part. The exact required information varies by study and governing framework.
Read Guide →Potential participants need enough relevant information to make an informed decision, but not every detail has to appear in the first recruitment message. The amount, timing, and organization of disclosure depend on whether researchers are recruiting interest, seeking informed consent, or using an ethics-approved alteration of consent.
Read Guide →An organization cannot make voluntary research participation compulsory simply by calling it a course requirement or workplace task. The answer depends first on whether the activity is actually research, then on the applicable consent rules, alternatives, penalties, and ethics-review framework.
Read Guide →Course credit can be used as a research incentive, but students must not be placed in a position where research is effectively the only practical way to earn the credit. A comparable non-research alternative and protection against academic penalties are central to voluntariness.
Read Guide →Students offered course credit for research should have an equitable non-research way to earn the same credit. The alternative should require reasonably comparable time and effort without making research participation the easier or academically safer choice.
Read Guide →Researchers should not collect identifying information simply because it might be useful later. Each identifier should serve a defensible research or operational purpose, and the appropriate amount depends on what the study actually needs to accomplish.
Read Guide →A good research debrief does more than reveal that deception occurred. It should explain the study’s actual purpose, identify what was false or withheld, explain why the alteration was necessary, correct important misconceptions, and communicate any participant options required by the governing ethics framework.
Read Guide →Plagiarism in research is not limited to copying sentences. It can involve taking another person's words, ideas, processes, results, or other intellectual contributions without giving appropriate credit.
Read Guide →Paraphrasing usually does not remove the need to cite a source. Your wording may be new, but the idea, finding, interpretation, or information can still belong to the source you used.
Read Guide →An attribution problem does not necessarily disappear because it was accidental. Yet accidental plagiarism and a formal finding of research misconduct are not automatically the same thing, because intent and applicable policy matter.
Read Guide →A thesis can often be developed into one or more journal articles, but there is no universal percentage of acceptable overlap. What matters is the type of material reused, transparency, journal policy, copyright, and whether the article is genuinely shaped as a journal publication.
Read Guide →Developing a hypothesis after seeing your results can be scientifically useful. HARKing occurs when that post hoc hypothesis is presented as though it had been predicted before the results were known.
Read Guide →Industry sponsorship deserves attention because empirical research has found associations between sponsorship and sponsor-favorable results or conclusions in some fields. That evidence supports greater scrutiny, not automatic rejection of every industry-funded study.
Read Guide →Research assistance and ghostwriting can involve similar tasks, but they differ in how intellectual contributions, responsibility, and authorship are represented. Learn when paid writing support is legitimate, when undisclosed contributions become problematic, and how researchers can establish ethical boundaries before engaging external writers.
Read Guide →